Defining a Dispensational Covenant Theology


The Thesis

Covenant Theology and Dispensationalism are often presented as two completely incompatible systems of theology. Of course, they have their differences, but many dispensational theologians also share the concern of rightly understanding the relationships between the various biblical covenants. Given this reality, it begs an important question, why can’t dispensationalists have their own covenant theology?

This website is an exploration of that idea. What would a Dispensational Federalism look like? What would happen if dispensationalists were to step out of bounds, and begin to discuss their differences within the same theological framework, and using the same theological categories as reformed covenant theologians?

I’ve been considering this for some time and think the results will be quite fascinating.

My thesis, is that a Dispensational Federalism is not only viable, but actually has the potential to give the most accurate account of the biblical data. Further, that the true strength and genius of many dispensational distinctives stem from a rather surprising place, their covenant theology!

In our next article, we will consider Tenet No.1, that dispensational federalists affirm the representative headship of Adam and Christ.



One response to “The Thesis”

  1. […] to everything just noted. As we have opportunity to do that, we anticipate the strength of The Thesis will become increasingly […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Unfinished Business – Dispensational Federalism Cancel reply

About Me

Andrew Young is the Editor of DispensationalFederalism.com. He has previously served as an Elder and Associate Pastor at Riverbend Bible Church, New Zealand. He currently serves as a board member of Trinity Theological Institute and Gracebooks NZ, he teaches monthly at Wiararapa Bible Church, attends Onekawa Bible Church with his wife and four children, and is happy to be referred to as a Reformed Dispensationalist.

Newsletter